Asymptotic method for Dougall's bilateral hypergeometric sums
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Minimal Decomposition of Inde nite Hypergeometric Sums
We present an algorithm which, given a hypergeometric term T (n), constructs hypergeometric terms T1(n) and T2(n) such that T (n) = T1(n + 1) ? T1(n) + T2(n), and T2(n) is minimal in some sense. This solves the decomposition problem for indeenite sums of hypergeometric terms: T1(n + 1) ? T1(n) is the \summable part" and T2(n) the \non-summable part" of T (n).
متن کاملComposition Sums Related to the Hypergeometric Function
The present note considers a certain family of sums indexed by the set of fixed length compositions of a given number. The sums in question cannot be realized as weighted compositions. However they can be be related to the hypergeometric function, thereby allowing one to factorize the corresponding generating polynomials. This factorization leads to some interesting identities. An l-composition...
متن کاملClosed-form sums for some perturbation series involving hypergeometric functions
Infinite series of the type ∞ ∑ n=1 ( 2 )n n 1 n! 2F1(−n, b; γ; y) are investigated. Closed-form sums are obtained for α a positive integer α = 1, 2, 3, . . . . The limiting case of b → ∞, after y is replaced with x2/b, leads to ∞ ∑ n=1 ( 2 )n n 1 n! 1F1(−n, γ, x2). This type of series appears in the first-order perturbation correction for the wavefunction of the generalized spiked harmonic osc...
متن کاملHypergeometric formulas for lattice sums and Mahler measures
Equation (3) is an interesting conjecture, because it relates a complicated lattice sum to the 3F2 hypergeometric function. Lattice sums have been extensively studied in physics, since they often arise when calculating electrostatic potentials of crystal lattices (for instance see [15], [25] and [14]). It is often difficult to calculate lattice sums numerically, and it is quite unusual to be ab...
متن کاملAsymptotic Representations of Confluent Hypergeometric Functions.
I A more general theory will result if in the place of R we employ an abstract normed ring. s We use the symbols =, ... ... in more than one sense. No confusion need arise as tie context makes clear the meaning of each such symbol. It is worth while to mention here that the relation of equality = for E1 as well as for E2 is not an independent primitive idea; for, an equivalent set of postulates...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0007-4497
DOI: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2006.09.002